Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-06 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black and White | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 309.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 3S is just a bit better than the Lumia 950, with a score of 75.8 against 74.1. Nubia Red Magic 3S is a incredibly newer phone than the Lumia 950, but it is thicker and extremely heavier. The nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie operating system, and Lumia 950 comes with Windows 10 Mobile operating system.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a quite better performance than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM. Microsoft Lumia 950 features a more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a better number of pixels per inch in the display.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a superior camera than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has a way better video resolution, a bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality, a larger aperture and a back facing camera with much more megapixels. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Microsoft Lumia 950, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a very superior battery lifetime than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has a 67 percent greater battery capacity.
Although nubia Red Magic 3S is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Microsoft Lumia 950, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Microsoft Lumia 950. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the nubia Red Magic 3S, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Microsoft Lumia 950, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.