Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Samsung |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 12, 11 |
| 2015-10-06 | 2021-07-02 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 309.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 has a global score of 76.1, which is a little bit better than Microsoft Lumia 950's global score of 74.1. Even though Galaxy A22 is newer than the Microsoft Lumia 950, it is somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker. The Galaxy A22 works with Android 12 operating system, while Microsoft Lumia 950 works with Windows 10 Mobile operating system.
The Galaxy A22 features a greater processing power than Lumia 950, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and they are faster). The Lumia 950 features a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher pixels density and a way better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 features a much better storage for games and applications than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB. The Lumia 950 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A22, because although it has a way less mega pixels back facing camera and a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting images and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
Lumia 950 features a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.