Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Samsung |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 14 |
| 2015-10-06 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 309.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 8.19 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a little bit better than the Lumia 950, with a general score of 79.9 against 74.1. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a way newer cellphone than the Lumia 950, although it is just a little thicker and noticeably heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 operating system, and Lumia 950 has Windows 10 Mobile operating system.
The Lumia 950 features a very superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores. The Microsoft Lumia 950 has a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a much bigger memory for apps and games than Lumia 950, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a much better battery life than Lumia 950, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Galaxy A25 5G shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Lumia 950, because although it has a tinier sensor which provides a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a larger aperture for better photography and video in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.