Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Samsung |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 13 |
| 2015-10-06 | -- |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 5.29 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 309.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A34 has an overall score of 82.9, which is much better than Microsoft Lumia 950's 74.1 general score. Samsung Galaxy A34 is a noticeably lighter and way thinner cellphone than Microsoft Lumia 950. The Samsung Galaxy A34 comes with Android 13 OS, and Microsoft Lumia 950 works with Windows 10 Mobile OS.
The Galaxy A34 counts with a superior performance than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has more cores and 1 GB more RAM memory. Lumia 950 features a sharper screen than Galaxy A34, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better 2560 x 1440px resolution.
Lumia 950 features a better storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A34, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 200 GB. Galaxy A34 has a much better battery performance than Lumia 950, because it has a 67% greater battery capacity.
The Microsoft Lumia 950 has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A34, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for taking images and videos in low-light environments, a lot lower resolution back facing camera and a smaller sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.