Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Samsung |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 14 |
| 2015-10-06 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 309.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 8.19 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A35 5G is a little bit better than the Microsoft Lumia 950, having a 79.4 score against 74.1. Galaxy A35 5G comes with Android 14 OS, while Microsoft Lumia 950 counts with Windows 10 Mobile OS. The Galaxy A35 5G body has the same thickness than the Microsoft Lumia 950, but it's heavier.
Microsoft Lumia 950 has a much better looking screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. Lumia 950 features a lot better processing power than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 7 less cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Lumia 950, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A35 5G has a much better camera than Lumia 950, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a lot better 50 MP resolution camera in the back, a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Lumia 950, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.