Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Samsung |
| Windows 10 Mobile | -- |
| 2015-10-06 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 309.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is a lot better than Microsoft Lumia 950's 74.1 general score. The Galaxy A52 body is much newer than Microsoft Lumia 950's, although it's a little bit thicker and incredibly heavier. The Microsoft Lumia 950 has a brighter display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Galaxy A52 has a very superior storage for games and applications than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 features a quite better hardware performance than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has 3 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores.
The Galaxy A52 captures much better photographs and videos than Microsoft Lumia 950, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A52 also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures, a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a much larger back camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a superior battery performance than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.