Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Samsung |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 12, 11 |
| 2015-10-06 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 309.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is a lot better than Lumia 950, getting a global score of 91.3 against 74.1. Galaxy A52 5G works with Android 12 OS, and Lumia 950 comes with Windows 10 Mobile OS. The Galaxy A52 5G construction is noticeably newer than Lumia 950's, although it's a lot heavier and just a little thicker.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a better processing unit than Lumia 950, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. Microsoft Lumia 950 features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a much better memory to store more games and applications than Lumia 950, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G has a much better battery performance than Lumia 950, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures much clearer videos and photos than Lumia 950, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures, a lot bigger sensor and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.