Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Samsung |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-06 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 309.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is a lot better than Microsoft Lumia 950, having a global score of 97.6 against 74.1. Galaxy Fold comes with Android 9.0 Pie OS, while Microsoft Lumia 950 comes with Windows 10 Mobile OS. Galaxy Fold is a noticeably newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than Microsoft Lumia 950, although it is also extremely heavier.
The Lumia 950 has a much sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a much better number of pixels per display inch and a little higher resolution of 2560 x 1440. The Galaxy Fold counts with a greater hardware performance than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has a greater number of cores and 9 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Microsoft Lumia 950, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a superior battery lifetime than Lumia 950, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold's camera is just as good as Microsoft Lumia 950's camera, because although the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a back-facing camera with a lot worse resolution, a smaller camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a lot bigger camera aperture.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Lumia 950, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Lumia 950. If you want to save some money, you can buy Lumia 950, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.