Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Samsung |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 14 |
| 2015-10-06 | -- |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 309.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 8.19 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S24 FE has a general score of 76, which is just a bit better than the Lumia 950's score of 74.1. Galaxy S24 FE works with Android 14 OS, while Lumia 950 counts with Windows 10 Mobile OS. The Galaxy S24 FE design is a little bit thinner but way heavier than the Lumia 950. Lumia 950 features a much better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, although it has 5 GB less RAM, they both have 1 processing cores.
The Microsoft Lumia 950 counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel count per inch in the display and a better 2560 x 1440px resolution. The Lumia 950 has just a bit better camera than Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photos in low-light situations and a back facing camera with much less MP.
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE features a greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Lumia 950, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has a way better battery life than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Lumia 950, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Lumia 950. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, else you can save some money and buy the Lumia 950, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.