Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Samsung |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-06 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 309.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is way better than Lumia 950's overall score of 74.1. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much heavier than the Lumia 950, it's thinner and also incredibly newer. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 works with Android 11 operating system, while Lumia 950 has Windows 10 Mobile operating system.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a better performing CPU than Lumia 950, because it has a greater number of faster cores and 9 GB more RAM. Lumia 950 has a sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit worse 2560 x 1440 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better display density.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Microsoft Lumia 950, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots slightly better photos and videos than Microsoft Lumia 950, because although it has a camera with lot less megapixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a bigger aperture for better photos in poorly lited environments.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much longer battery duration than Lumia 950, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Microsoft Lumia 950, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Microsoft Lumia 950. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Microsoft Lumia 950, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.