Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Xiaomi |
| Windows 10 Mobile | -- |
| 2015-10-06 | 2018-04-03 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 309.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is much better than the Microsoft Lumia 950, getting a global score of 83.8 against 74.1. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a noticeably heavier phone than the Microsoft Lumia 950, but both of them are 0.32inches thick. Lumia 950 features a better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher display pixels density.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a better processing power than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has a larger number of cores and 5 GB more RAM memory. The Lumia 950 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Lumia 950 also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better 20 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Microsoft Lumia 950, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a little longer battery performance than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has a 13% more battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is way more expensive than Lumia 950, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.