Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Xiaomi |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 11 |
| 2015-10-06 | -- |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 309.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is much better than Microsoft Lumia 950, getting an 86.1 score against 74.1. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with Android 11 OS, while Microsoft Lumia 950 works with Windows 10 Mobile OS. Even being the best in this comparison review, Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a a little thicker and way heavier device than Microsoft Lumia 950.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a more powerful processing unit than Lumia 950, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM. Microsoft Lumia 950 features a much better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a much smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Microsoft Lumia 950, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a lot better 108 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Microsoft Lumia 950, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a way better battery life than Lumia 950, because it has a 72% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.