Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | ZTE |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-06 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 309.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a general score of 80.2, which is a little bit better than the Lumia 950's global score of 74.1. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro body is noticeably newer and a little thinner than Lumia 950's, although it is heavier. ZTE Axon 10 Pro works with Android 10 OS, while Lumia 950 has Windows 10 Mobile OS.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a more powerful processing unit than Lumia 950, because it has 9 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of cores. The Lumia 950 counts with a sharper screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel amount per screen inch and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Lumia 950, because it has 256 GB internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with longer battery lifetime than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has a 33 percent larger battery capacity.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Lumia 950, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has higher video frame rates, a larger aperture and a back camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Although ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Lumia 950, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Lumia 950. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Lumia 950, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.