Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | ZTE |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 11 |
| 2015-10-06 | 2021-06-04 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 309.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a little bit better than the Lumia 950, with a score of 78.1 against 74.1. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's construction is much newer and a little thinner than Lumia 950's, although it's extremely heavier. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra comes with Android 11 operating system, and Lumia 950 comes with Windows 10 Mobile operating system.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a better performing processor than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. Lumia 950 has a sharper display than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better pixels quantity per inch of screen.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a much better camera than Lumia 950, because it has a way more MP back facing camera, a lot higher video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and videos. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a better memory capacity for games and applications than Microsoft Lumia 950, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a much better battery life than Lumia 950, because it has a 53 percent larger battery capacity.
Although ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Lumia 950, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Lumia 950. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Lumia 950, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.