Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-20 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Glacier and Obsidian | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 540.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2688 x 1892 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4449mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is a little bit better than the Microsoft Surface Duo 2, with an 88.1 score against 85.3. The iPhone X is an extremely older and thicker phone than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, but Apple managed to build it lighter anyway. IPhone X counts with a little bit better screen than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a much smaller display, much worse brightness and a way worse resolution of 1125 x 2436px, it also counts with a bit higher pixels count in each inch in the display.
IPhone X has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The iPhone X counts with a little faster processing unit than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has lesser and slower cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a much better battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 64% more battery size. IPhone X features a little bit better camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing images and/or video in low light situations, they both have a same resolution camera, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Microsoft Surface Duo 2. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the iPhone X, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Microsoft Surface Duo 2, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.