Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-20 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Glacier and Obsidian | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 540.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1892 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4449mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a global score of 85.3, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 4's 81.9 score. Microsoft Surface Duo 2's design is newer and much thinner than the Google Pixel 4's, but it's incredibly heavier. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a much larger display and a way higher 1892 x 2688 resolution.
Google Pixel 4 has a CPU that is very similar to the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 one, and although the Google Pixel 4 has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal memory.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4449mAh of battery capacity. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 takes a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, although it has a lower resolution back facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, they both have a same size aperture.
Although Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 4. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Microsoft Surface Duo 2, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 4, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.