Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-20 | 2020-05-07 |
| 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Glacier and Obsidian | Mirror black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 540.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2688 x 1892 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4449mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a bit better than the LG Q70, with an 85.3 score against 77.9. Although the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a lot heavier than the LG Q70, it's incredibly thinner and also newer. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has newer 11 version and LG Q70 has Android 10.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a little faster processor than LG Q70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a bit more vivid screen than LG Q70, because although it has a quite worse pixels density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a lot better 1892 x 2688 pixels resolution.
The LG Q70 counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has just a little better battery life than LG Q70, because it has 4449mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The LG Q70 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a tinier aperture and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG Q70 also counts with a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is way more expensive than the LG Q70, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.