Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-20 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Glacier and Obsidian | Black and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 540.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2688 x 1892 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4449mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a little bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, having an 85.3 score against 81.3. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 body is a lot newer and way thinner than the LG V35 ThinQ's, although it is also noticeably heavier. LG V35 ThinQ and Microsoft Surface Duo 2 feature incredibly similar screens, because although the LG V35 ThinQ has a lot smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1440 x 2880px, it also counts with a better screen pixel density.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has a processor that's just as good as the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 one, and although the LG V35 ThinQ has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
LG V35 ThinQ and Microsoft Surface Duo 2 count with incredibly similar cameras, because although the LG V35 ThinQ has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photography and video in low light environments and a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with better battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 35% larger battery size.
Although Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V35 ThinQ. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get LG V35 ThinQ, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.