Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-20 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Glacier and Obsidian | Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 540.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2688 x 1892 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4449mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is a bit better than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, with an 87.6 score against 85.3. Both devices we are comparing here include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. LG V60 ThinQ's construction is noticeably lighter than the Microsoft Surface Duo 2, but it's extremely thicker and was released about 18 months before.
The LG V60 ThinQ's CPU is just as good as the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 one, both of them have a 8 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a bit more vivid screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because it has a little more pixels per screen inch, a larger display and a better 1892 x 2688 resolution.
The LG V60 ThinQ captures a little bit better photos and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a back camera with a much better resolution.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage for apps and games than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ counts with just a little better battery life than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has a 12 percent more battery size.
LG V60 ThinQ is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.