Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 13 |
| 2021-09-20 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Glacier and Obsidian | Interstellar Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 540.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1892 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4449mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a global score of 85.3, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro's global score of 83.4. Although Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is older and heavier than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, it's body is still noticeably thinner. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS, but the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 and Motorola Edge 40 Pro count with similar displays, because although the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little smaller screen and a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a brighter screen.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a little better battery duration than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has a 3 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.