Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-09-20 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Glacier and Obsidian | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 540.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2688 x 1892 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4449mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having a overall score of 85.3 against 81.9. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version. Microsoft Surface Duo 2's design is incredibly thinner than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it is notably heavier and was released many years before.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a better looking screen than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a bit worse 1256 x 2760 pixels resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display and way more brightness.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much better camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with much more storage for apps and games than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 4449mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.