Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-09-20 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Glacier and Obsidian | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 540.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1892 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4449mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a little bit better than the Microsoft Surface Duo 2, getting an 86.3 score against 85.3. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a more recent 14 version while Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has Android 11, so it provides the user a lot of extra features. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro design is a lot newer and notably lighter, but incredibly thicker than Microsoft Surface Duo 2.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a little more vivid display than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little bit smaller display and a bit worse display density, it also counts with much more display brightness. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a better camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a bigger aperture and a much more megapixels back camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a battery duration that is just as good as the battery duration in Microsoft Surface Duo 2, although the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4449mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.