Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-09-20 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Glacier and Obsidian | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 540.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1892 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4449mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Microsoft Surface Duo 2's global score of 85.3. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is noticeably newer and notably lighter than the Microsoft Surface Duo 2's, although it's incredibly thicker. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has Android 11.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid screen than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a little smaller screen, a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit lower amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a way brighter screen. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a battery lifetime that's very similar to the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 one, although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4449mAh.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a bigger camera aperture for better low light photos and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.