Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-20 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Glacier and Obsidian | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 540.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2688 x 1892 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4449mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, having an 85.3 score against 77.4. Microsoft Surface Duo 2's body is newer and a bit thinner than Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it's also incredibly heavier. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has way lesser pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a way larger display and a little higher 1892 x 2688 resolution.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a really longer battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4449mAh of battery capacity instead of 2730mAh. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a back-facing camera with a 12 MP resolution and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has faster video frame rate and a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light environments.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is also a lot cheaper, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.