Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-20 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Glacier and Obsidian | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 540.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1892 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPS |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4449mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a general score of 85.3, which is a bit better than the Motorola One 5G Ace's 81.6 overall score. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 design is a lot heavier but notably thinner than the Motorola One 5G Ace, and both were released only 8 months apart. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because it has a larger screen, a better resolution of 1892 x 2688 and a just a little greater pixels density.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has more RAM memory. The Motorola One 5G Ace takes a bit better photographs and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a F1.7 camera aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a back camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution.
Motorola One 5G Ace features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. Motorola One 5G Ace has just a bit longer battery life than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a better device, it costs more than Motorola One 5G Ace, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola One 5G Ace. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Microsoft Surface Duo 2, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Motorola One 5G Ace, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.