Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-20 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Glacier and Obsidian | Blue and Brown |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 540.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2688 x 1892 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4449mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has an overall score of 85.3, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Vision's 80.7 global score. Although Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is extremely heavier than Motorola One Vision, it's much thinner and way newer. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a bit worse display pixel density, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1892 x 2688 pixels and a way larger display.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features just a bit better performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Motorola One Vision features a much greater storage to install games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Vision also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Motorola One Vision captures better photos and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has longer battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 4449mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.