Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-20 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Glacier and Obsidian | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 540.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2688 x 1892 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4449mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is a little bit better than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, having an 87 score against 85.3. The Motorola razr (2020) construction is noticeably lighter than the Microsoft Surface Duo 2, but it is noticeably thicker and was released only 12 months before. These phones use the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a better display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a much higher resolution of 1892 x 2688px, a way larger display and a little bit more pixels per display inch. Motorola razr (2020) features a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola razr (2020). Both of them have 8 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4449mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a better camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a camera with much more MP.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Microsoft Surface Duo 2. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Motorola razr (2020), otherwise you can save some money and buy the Microsoft Surface Duo 2, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.