Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-20 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Glacier and Obsidian | Cyber shade |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 540.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1892 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4449mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having a global score of 85.3 against 75.8. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has the previous 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a newer and thinner phone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, although it is way heavier.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a bit sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a bigger display, a just a bit greater pixel number per inch in the screen and a way better resolution of 1892 x 2688px. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has more internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a superior camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot better video definition and a back facing camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4449mAh.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.