Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-20 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Glacier and Obsidian | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 540.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2688 x 1892 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4449mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is slightly better than the Galaxy A30s, with an 85.3 score against 79.8. Although Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is incredibly heavier than the Galaxy A30s, it's thinner and also much newer. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has an incredibly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a greater pixels density, a way higher resolution of 1892 x 2688 and a larger display.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has more RAM. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a back facing camera with a much lower 12 mega-pixels resolution, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A30s counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A30s also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a little better battery performance than Galaxy A30s, because it has a 4449mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.