Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-09-20 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Glacier and Obsidian | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 540.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2688 x 1892 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 396 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4449mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a global score of 85.3, which is a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 global score. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 design is newer and thinner than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's, but it is a bit heavier. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has older 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little sharper display than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a bit worse 1440 x 2560 resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen density. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a quite bigger memory to install games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light images and video, and they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also counts with a way better (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a battery life that's just as good as Microsoft Surface Duo 2's battery life, although the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4449mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.