Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-09-20 | 2024-09-26 |
| 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches | 6.32 x 2.96 x 0.31 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Glacier and Obsidian | Lemon Green, Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 540.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1892 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 4000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali G615-MC6 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4449mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is slightly better than the Xiaomi 14T, with a global score of 85.3 against 83.7. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 body is way thinner than Xiaomi 14T, but it is way heavier and was released many years before. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has the older 11 version and Xiaomi 14T has Android 14.
Xiaomi 14T has a better display than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a bit lower 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixel number per screen inch and a lot brighter display. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a way better hardware performance than Xiaomi 14T, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Xiaomi 14T counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi 14T has just a bit longer battery duration than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Xiaomi 14T captures a lot better videos and photos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi 14T also has a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.