Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-20 | 2020-05-12 |
| 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Glacier and Obsidian | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 540.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1892 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4449mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is just a bit better than the Microsoft Surface Duo 2, having an 87.9 score against 85.3. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro construction is extremely lighter than the Microsoft Surface Duo 2, although it is incredibly thicker and was released just a little further than a year before. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the older 10 version while Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has Android 11.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro and Microsoft Surface Duo 2 both count with extremely similar processing units, and although the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same screen brightness, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has a little higher pixel density, a better 1892 x 2688px resolution and a bigger display.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro takes way better videos and photos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way better video definition and a much more MP camera. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's storage for games and applications is very similar to Microsoft Surface Duo 2's one, they have equal 128 GB internal memory.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little better battery lifetime than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4449mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.