Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-10 | 2019-10-24 |
| 7.36 x 5.72 x 0.19 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.82 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Glacier | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 540.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2700 x 1800 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 11.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3577mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than the Microsoft Surface Duo, having a global score of 81.9 against 78.8. Despite of the fact Google Pixel 4 is older and way thicker than the Microsoft Surface Duo, it's body is still incredibly lighter. Google Pixel 4 features a processor that is just as good as the CPU in Microsoft Surface Duo, they have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit sharper display than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has a way smaller screen and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a little bit higher number of pixels per inch in the display. Google Pixel 4 shoots clearer photographs and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Google Pixel 4 also counts with a more megapixels back camera and a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and video.
Microsoft Surface Duo counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. The Microsoft Surface Duo counts with better battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3577mAh battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.