Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-09-10 | 2018-11-09 |
| 7.36 x 5.72 x 0.19 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.82 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Glacier | Black and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 540.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2700 x 1800 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 11.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3577mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo has a score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than the LG G7 Fit's 77 global score. The Microsoft Surface Duo is a newer and thinner phone than LG G7 Fit, although it's also noticeably heavier. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but Microsoft Surface Duo has 10 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The Microsoft Surface Duo has a bit faster processor than LG G7 Fit, because it has more processing cores and more RAM. The LG G7 Fit has a better looking screen than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has a way smaller display and a quite lower 1440 x 3120 resolution, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch of screen.
The LG G7 Fit shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has a tinier aperture and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels. The LG G7 Fit counts with a much better storage for applications and games than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Microsoft Surface Duo features superior battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 19% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.