Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-09-10 | 2015-10-01 |
| 7.36 x 5.72 x 0.19 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 8.82 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Glacier | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 540.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2700 x 1800 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 11.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3577mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo has a global score of 78.8, which is slightly better than LG V10's overall score of 78.6. These devices use Android operating system, but Microsoft Surface Duo has the newer 10 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1 version. Although Microsoft Surface Duo is extremely heavier than LG V10, it's noticeably thinner and a lot newer.
Microsoft Surface Duo counts with a better processor than LG V10, because it has more RAM and a higher number of faster cores. The LG V10 features a much better display than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has a way smaller screen and a bit worse 2560 x 1440px resolution, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
The LG V10 counts with a much better camera than Microsoft Surface Duo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG V10 also has faster 120 frames per second video frame rates, a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures.
LG V10 features a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Microsoft Surface Duo features longer battery duration than LG V10, because it has 3577mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Microsoft Surface Duo is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V10. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Microsoft Surface Duo, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the LG V10, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.