Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-10 | 2018-06-08 |
| 7.36 x 5.72 x 0.19 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 8.82 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Glacier | Black and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 540.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2700 x 1800 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 11.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3577mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than Microsoft Surface Duo's overall score of 78.8. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is noticeably lighter than Microsoft Surface Duo, but it is extremely thicker and was released many years before. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little sharper screen than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit lower 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ and Microsoft Surface Duo both feature extremely similar processing units, both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores.
LG V35 ThinQ captures better photos and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a much more MP back facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and video.
The Microsoft Surface Duo features a little longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 3577mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the LG V35 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.