Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-10 | 2024-04-16 |
| 7.36 x 5.72 x 0.19 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 8.82 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Glacier | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 540.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2700 x 1800 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 11.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3577mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is much better than Microsoft Surface Duo's 78.8 global score. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version and Microsoft Surface Duo has Android 10. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra design is extremely newer and extremely lighter, but incredibly thicker than Microsoft Surface Duo.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more vivid screen than Microsoft Surface Duo, although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, a quite smaller screen and a little bit inferior pixels quantity in each inch in the display. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Microsoft Surface Duo counts with a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features better battery performance than Microsoft Surface Duo, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3577mAh.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures way better videos and photos than Microsoft Surface Duo, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in low-light situations and a way more MP back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.