Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-10 | 2019-05-15 |
| 7.36 x 5.72 x 0.19 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 8.82 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Glacier | Blue and Brown |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 540.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2700 x 1800 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 11.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3577mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision has a score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than the Microsoft Surface Duo's 78.8 general score. Motorola One Vision's body is extremely lighter than the Microsoft Surface Duo, although it is much thicker and was released only 16 months before. Motorola One Vision and Microsoft Surface Duo have similar displays, because although the Motorola One Vision has a lot smaller display and a lot lower 1080 x 2520 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater screen density.
Microsoft Surface Duo features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Microsoft Surface Duo also has 2 GB more RAM. The Motorola One Vision shoots much better pictures and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a back-facing camera with way more MP and a bigger aperture to take better low light images and videos.
The Motorola One Vision has a much bigger storage for apps and games than Microsoft Surface Duo, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola One Vision also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Microsoft Surface Duo has a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 2 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.