Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-10 | 2019-09-05 |
| 7.36 x 5.72 x 0.19 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.82 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Glacier | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 540.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2700 x 1800 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 11.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3577mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is a bit better than Microsoft Surface Duo, with a general score of 80 against 78.8. Motorola One Zoom's body is lighter than the Microsoft Surface Duo, but it's thicker and was released about 12 months before. Microsoft Surface Duo counts with a bit better performance than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Microsoft Surface Duo also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Microsoft Surface Duo counts with a little sharper display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little worse pixels amount per inch in the display, it also counts with a higher 1800 x 2700px resolution and a larger display. Motorola One Zoom features a very superior camera than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution and a bigger aperture.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Zoom also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB. The Motorola One Zoom has a bit superior battery duration than Microsoft Surface Duo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3577mAh.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Motorola One Zoom is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.