Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-09-10 | 2022-02-25 |
| 7.36 x 5.72 x 0.19 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.82 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Glacier | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 540.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2700 x 1800 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 11.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3577mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is a lot better than the Microsoft Surface Duo's general score of 78.8. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a newer and just a little lighter device than Microsoft Surface Duo, but it's also noticeably thicker. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Microsoft Surface Duo has Android 10 version, so it gives some extra features and some performance improvements.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better looking display than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has a bit worse 1440 x 3088 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little greater screen density. Microsoft Surface Duo counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Microsoft Surface Duo and the Galaxy S22 Ultra both feature really similar storage to store more games and applications, both have the same internal memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Microsoft Surface Duo, because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a way more MP camera.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much longer battery duration than Microsoft Surface Duo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more money than Microsoft Surface Duo, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.