Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-09-10 | 2020-09-08 |
| 7.36 x 5.72 x 0.19 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 8.82 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Glacier | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 540.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2700 x 1800 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 11.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3577mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a general score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than the Microsoft Surface Duo's score of 78.8. These phones use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). Although Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC and the Microsoft Surface Duo were released only 0 months apart, Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's design is lighter but also extremely thicker than the Microsoft Surface Duo.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a little bit better screen than Microsoft Surface Duo, although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, a just a bit worse screen pixel density and a bit smaller screen. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a slightly bigger storage to install games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
The Microsoft Surface Duo has a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM memory amount. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC captures much clearer videos and photos than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a very superior battery duration than Microsoft Surface Duo, because it has a 5160mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.