Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.5 | 26 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | 2005-06-03 |
| 5.00 x 1.70 x 1.10 inches | 4.09 x 1.77 x 0.67 inches |
| 4.50 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 250.00 | $ 100.00 |
| 96 x 64 pixels | 96 x 68 pixels |
| -- | 65 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 4.6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| CDMA | GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 2.72 | 2.4 |
Comparison review
The Nokia 1600 is a bit better than the Motorola 120C, getting a global score of 26 against 24.5. The Nokia 1600 construction is lighter and notably thinner than Motorola 120C. The Nokia 1600 features a processing unit that is just as good as the processor in Motorola 120C, both have the same number of cores.
The Nokia 1600 features a much more vibrant display than Motorola 120C, because it has a little bit higher 68 x 96 resolution. Nokia 1600's camera is just as good as the Motorola 120C one. The Nokia 1600's storage capacity for apps and games is just as good as the Motorola 120C one. The Motorola 120C counts with superior battery life than Nokia 1600, because it has a 1100mAh battery capacity instead of 900mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Nokia 1600 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.