Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 23.7 | 26 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | 2005-06-03 |
| 5.10 x 1.90 x 1.00 inches | 4.09 x 1.77 x 0.67 inches |
| 5.00 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 2500.00 | $ 100.00 |
| -- | 96 x 68 pixels |
| -- | 65 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 4.6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| CDMA | GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Ni-MH Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 145 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.4 |
Comparison review
The Nokia 1600 has a score of 26, which is a little bit better than Motorola 2260's global score of 23.7. The Nokia 1600 is a a lot lighter and thinner cellphone than the Motorola 2260. Nokia 1600 features a processor that's very similar to Motorola 2260's CPU, they have the same number of cores. Nokia 1600 features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola 2260.
The Nokia 1600 counts with a camera that is very similar to Motorola 2260's camera. Motorola 2260 and Nokia 1600 both have quite similar memory for applications, games, photos and videos. Nokia 1600 has a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola 2260.
Nokia 1600 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.