Search


Compare phones

Samsung Champ

GT-C3300K, GT-C3300
Global Score
34.237.4
Basic Information
MotorolaSamsung
Linux--
--2010-05-19
3.77 x 2.04 x 0.85 inches3.79 x 2.12 x 0.51 inches
4.31 ounces2.82 ounces
$ 199.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
200 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
ResistiveResistive
6.36
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--30,72 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 8 GB) external memory slot
01.16
Camera
2.00 MP1.30 MP
4.734.51
EDGE and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.30.3
Battery Life
850mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
200 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
666 hours standby time
12 hours talk time
2.322.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
FM Radio--

Comparison review

The Samsung Champ is a bit better than the Motorola A1200 Ming, getting a overall score of 37.4 against 34.2. The Samsung Champ is a extremely thinner and incredibly lighter phone than Motorola A1200 Ming. Motorola A1200 Ming counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Champ, and although they both have the same exact resolution of 320 x 240, the Motorola A1200 Ming also has a quite better pixels number in each inch in the display.

The Samsung Champ features a much better storage for games and applications than Motorola A1200 Ming. Samsung Champ and Motorola A1200 Ming feature really similar processors, both have a 0-Core CPU. The Samsung Champ has greater battery performance than Motorola A1200 Ming, because it has an 18% more battery capacity.

The Motorola A1200 Ming features a slightly better camera than Samsung Champ, because it has a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.

Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Samsung Champ is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it an obvious call.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.