Search


Compare phones

Global Score
34.237.6
Basic Information
MotorolaSamsung
Linux--
--2010-11-29
3.77 x 2.04 x 0.85 inches4.59 x 2.11 x 0.59 inches
4.31 ounces3.81 ounces
--Black
$ 199.00$ 100.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
200 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
ResistiveNo touch screen
6.35.8
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--102,4 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
01.6
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
4.734.73
EDGE and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.30.1
Battery Life
850mAh Li-Ion Battery1140mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
200 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
288 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
2.322.8
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
--GPS
FM Radio--

Comparison review

Samsung Profile is a bit better than the Motorola A1200 Ming, having a overall score of 37.6 against 34.2. The Samsung Profile is a notably thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than Motorola A1200 Ming. The Motorola A1200 Ming features a bit better display than Samsung Profile, and although they both have the same resolution of 320 x 240px, the Motorola A1200 Ming also has a little bit higher pixel density.

Samsung Profile counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola A1200 Ming. The Samsung Profile and Motorola A1200 Ming have similar CPUs, both have 0 CPU cores. The Samsung Profile counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola A1200 Ming, because it has a 34 percent more battery capacity.

Samsung Profile has a camera that's just as good as the Motorola A1200 Ming one, both have a camera in the back with a 2 megapixels resolution.

Samsung Profile not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it an easy decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.