Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.6 | 26 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | 2005-06-03 |
| 5.31 x 2.08 x 0.95 inches | 4.09 x 1.77 x 0.67 inches |
| 5.60 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 139.00 | $ 100.00 |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 96 x 68 pixels |
| TFT | -- |
| -- | 65 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.9 | 4.6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| SD, MMC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| GPRS and GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 2 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.4 |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 1600 is a bit better than the Motorola A820, with a score of 26 against 24.6. Nokia 1600's body is notably lighter and a lot thinner than the Motorola A820. Nokia 1600 has a much sharper screen than Motorola A820, although it has a lot lower resolution of 68 x 96. Nokia 1600's memory to store more games and applications is very similar to Motorola A820's one, although the Nokia 1600 has no slot for an SD memory card.
Nokia 1600 counts with a CPU that is just as good as the CPU in Motorola A820, both of them have the same number of cores. The Nokia 1600 counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola A820, because it has a 900mAh battery size instead of 800mAh. The Nokia 1600's camera is just as good as the camera in Motorola A820.
The Nokia 1600 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.