Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 29.3 | 27.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Symbian 7.0 | -- |
| -- | 2004-09-10 |
| 5.83 x 2.36 x 0.94 inches | 3.46 x 1.81 x 0.86 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 4.26 ounces |
| $ 45.00 | $ 45.00 |
| 208 x 320 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| Resistive | No touch screen |
| 3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 8,19 MB internal memory | 32,77 MB internal memory |
| MMC, SD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| -- | 128 x 96 video resolution |
| 3.63 | 3.63 |
| UMTS, GPRS and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 760mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 160 hours standby time 2 hours talk time | 270 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 2.64 | 2.16 |
| GPS | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola A920 is a bit better than Nokia 7270, having a 29.3 score against 27.5. The Motorola A920 is a just a bit thicker and extremely heavier device than Nokia 7270. The Nokia 7270 and Motorola A920 both feature quite similar displays, although the Nokia 7270 has a way lower resolution of 160 x 128 pixels.
The Nokia 7270 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola A920, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 32,77 MB internal storage. The Nokia 7270 has a processing unit that's just as good as the processor in Motorola A920, they have the same number of cores.
Motorola A920 counts with a way better battery performance than Nokia 7270, because it has 1050mAh of battery capacity. Nokia 7270 counts with a camera that's just as good as the camera in Motorola A920, they have a same resolution back-facing camera.
Motorola A920 costs exactly the same than the Nokia 7270, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.