Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 29.5 | 31.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Symbian 7.0 | -- |
| -- | 2007-02-06 |
| 5.82 x 2.36 x 0.94 inches | 4.05 x 1.81 x 0.65 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 2.89 ounces |
| $ 45.00 | $ 45.00 |
| 208 x 320 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| TFT | STN |
| -- | 57 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | No touch screen |
| 3 | 4.5 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 12,29 MB internal memory | 2,05 MB internal memory |
| MMC, SD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 3.63 | 3.63 |
| GPRS and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1050mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 900mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 160 hours standby time 2 hours talk time | 300 hours standby time 8 hours talk time |
| 2.64 | 2.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.1 | -- |
| GPS | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
Sony Ericsson K200 is a bit better than Motorola A925, having a overall score of 31.7 against 29.5. Sony Ericsson K200's construction is incredibly lighter and incredibly thinner than Motorola A925. Sony Ericsson K200's processor is very similar to Motorola A925's processing unit, both of them have the same number of cores.
Sony Ericsson K200 features a way better looking screen than Motorola A925, although it has a lot worse resolution of 128 x 128. The Sony Ericsson K200 counts with a camera that's very similar to the Motorola A925 one, they have a back facing camera with a 0.3 MP. The Motorola A925 features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Sony Ericsson K200, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola A925 counts with longer battery duration than Sony Ericsson K200, because it has 1050mAh of battery capacity.
The Sony Ericsson K200 and the Motorola A925 cost exactly the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.