Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 2.3 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2011-10-20 | 2019-05-07 |
| 4.68 x 2.44 x 0.48 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.71 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.1 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 480 x 640 pixels (VGA) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 258 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8655 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Single-Core 1200 MHz processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 7.56 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 3.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 79 hours standby time 9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has a score of 78.8, which is a lot better than Motorola Admiral's 52.3 general score. Both devices in this review include Android operating system, but Google Pixel 3a has a newer 11 version and Motorola Admiral has Android 2.3 version. The Google Pixel 3a body is way newer and noticeably thinner than the Motorola Admiral's, but it is also a little bit heavier.
The Google Pixel 3a has a much better looking screen than Motorola Admiral, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2220 resolution, a much greater pixels number per display inch and a way bigger display. The Google Pixel 3a counts with a very superior processing unit than Motorola Admiral, because it has a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 3a features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Admiral, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 3a counts with a greater camera than Motorola Admiral, because it has a way higher (4K) video definition and a way more megapixels camera in the back.
The Google Pixel 3a features a much better battery lifetime than Motorola Admiral, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3a not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.