Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.3 | 57.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | ZTE |
| Android 2.3 | Android 7.1 Nougat |
| 2011-10-20 | 2017-07-14 |
| 4.68 x 2.44 x 0.48 inches | 6.14 x 3.06 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.71 ounces | 6.12 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 99.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 480 x 640 pixels (VGA) | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| TFT | -- |
| 258 pixels per inch | 267 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8655 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 8917 chipset |
| Single-Core 1200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 7.56 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.5 | 6.93 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 3.2 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 79 hours standby time 9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
ZTE Blade Spark has a score of 57.4, which is slightly better than Motorola Admiral's 52.3 general score. The ZTE Blade Spark body is much newer and noticeably thinner than the Motorola Admiral's, although it is incredibly heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS, but ZTE Blade Spark has a more recent 7.1 Nougat version while Motorola Admiral has Android 2.3, so it provides lots of additional features.
ZTE Blade Spark has a bit superior processor than Motorola Admiral, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores. Motorola Admiral has a bit better looking screen than ZTE Blade Spark, although it has a lot worse resolution of 640 x 480 pixels, a much smaller display and a just a little worse display pixels density.
The ZTE Blade Spark counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Admiral, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 128 GB and 16 GB internal memory. The ZTE Blade Spark counts with a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Admiral, because it has a 69% more battery capacity.
The ZTE Blade Spark features a way better camera than Motorola Admiral, because it has a back facing camera with a way higher resolution and a way better (Full HD) video definition.
The ZTE Blade Spark is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.